This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --part0_916634342_boundary For myself, noting and agreeing with the assertion of the general function of institutions like MIT in capitalist society and as instruments of expanded reproduction of that system, a few like Noam Chomsky do slip through and manage to survive. As for the fundamentally contradictory opinions looking through the same warped neoclassical lenses, well for enough money anything is possible or any form of shit is potentially elegantly quantifiable and marketable with sincerity and force as if force "proves" sincereity and real "evidence". By the way, has anyone suggested impeaching Clinton on the grounds that in spaying "presidue" or the presidentiall wad--"DNA Matter", he failed in his duty as a national role model and figure and example for the young in that he did not practice "safe sex". What if Starr had asked the following questions: "Whatever you had/did, if Monica Lewinski were HIV positive, would you or possibly Hillary or possibly someone else be well advised to get an HIV test? or Whatever you and Monica were doing, if Chelsea were doing the same thing with her prof at Stanford for an A, would you have any problem with that? But I just can't wait for the State of the Union. It will be Fellini-cubed or Apocalypse Now tripled in surrealism. I'm just going to love and and record it for posterity. Jim Craven In a message dated 1/17/99 5:12:02 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << Subj: [PEN-L:2229] Re: Re: Junk Science Date: 1/17/99 5:12:02 PM Pacific Standard Time From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henry C.K. Liu) Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIT is the Hoover Institute of technology. It houses a group of social scientists who sole purpose in lfe is to preserve science and technology for the exclusive use of the right wing worldwide. They think neo-liberals are communists. Henry C.K. Liu Jim Devine wrote: > At 03:30 PM 1/17/99 +0100, you wrote: > >The Wall Street Journal frequently denounces "junk science." By that they > >seem to meen expert testimony that supports seeking damages from some > >business. > > > > Richard Schmalensee, an MIT economist is testifying for Microsoft > >in the antitrust trial. The NY Times quoted him Thursday re whether or not > >Microsoft has a monopoly in operating systems. He says they don't. ... Only > >the worst students internalize this garbage and go on to be professors at > >MIT. > > The irony of this is that not only did Richard S testify at the Microsoft > trial but so did Franklin Fischer, who is also an econ. prof. at MIT. Guess > what? Fischer said _exactly the opposite of what S. said_: MS is a monopoly. > > ain't science grand? > > Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & > http://clawww.lmu.edu/Faculty/JDevine/JDevine.html ----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rly-yd04.mx.aol.com (rly-yd04.mail.aol.com [172.18.150.4]) by Received: from galaxy.csuchico.edu (galaxy.CSUChico.EDU [132.241.82.21]) by rly-yd04.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) Sun, 17 Jan 1999 20:11:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) Sun, 17 Jan 1999 17:10:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.mindspring.com (smtp1.mindspring.com [207.69.200.31]) Received: from mindspring.com (user-38ld02t.dialup.mindspring.com [209.86.128.93]) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Henry C.K. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Accept-Language: en,zh-TW,zh,zh-CN MIME-Version: 1.0 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:2229] Re: Re: Junk Science References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Listprocessor-Version: 8.2.08 -- ListProc(tm) by CREN >> --part0_916634342_boundary Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> by rly-yd04.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) Sun, 17 Jan 1999 20:11:58 -0500 (EST) Sun, 17 Jan 1999 17:10:38 -0800 (PST) [209.86.128.93]) Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 20:05:11 -0800 From: "Henry C.K. Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:2229] Re: Re: Junk Science Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIT is the Hoover Institute of technology. It houses a group of social scientists who sole purpose in lfe is to preserve science and technology for the exclusive use of the right wing worldwide. They think neo-liberals are communists. Henry C.K. Liu Jim Devine wrote: > At 03:30 PM 1/17/99 +0100, you wrote: > >The Wall Street Journal frequently denounces "junk science." By that they > >seem to meen expert testimony that supports seeking damages from some > >business. > > > > Richard Schmalensee, an MIT economist is testifying for Microsoft > >in the antitrust trial. The NY Times quoted him Thursday re whether or not > >Microsoft has a monopoly in operating systems. He says they don't. ... Only > >the worst students internalize this garbage and go on to be professors at > >MIT. > > The irony of this is that not only did Richard S testify at the Microsoft > trial but so did Franklin Fischer, who is also an econ. prof. at MIT. Guess > what? Fischer said _exactly the opposite of what S. said_: MS is a monopoly. > > ain't science grand? > > Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & > http://clawww.lmu.edu/Faculty/JDevine/JDevine.html --part0_916634342_boundary--
