Michael is quite right. He has urged me not to characterize Doug's thoughts and I found myself slipping back into that mode again yesterday. After writing something and hitting the enter key, I slapped my forehead and said, "Goddamnit, that was a characterization, what got into me?". In a way, this whole discussion has run out of steam anyhow, so I doubt that there is much risk in crossing boundaries of permissible behavior. What I should do is concentrate on an article for a print publication on the aftermath of the Sokal affair, which this really is about. For the time being, I promise to stop being a gadfly. At 07:56 AM 2/23/99 -0800, you wrote: >I think that we should let Doug Henwood characterize his own thought rather >than impose our own interpretations. >-- > >Michael Perelman >Economics Department >California State University >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Chico, CA 95929 >530-898-5321 >fax 530-898-5901 > > > Louis Proyect (http://www.panix.com/~lnp3/marxism.html)
