At 11:03 AM 8/8/00 -0400, you wrote: >The U.S.Ct. wouldn't take Hale's case. Personally, I think that's wrong. I >think he should be admitted to the bar (if he passes the bar exam) >regardless of his political views. There's legal basis for this--the cases >from the 60s saying that the states couldn't keep commies out of the bar. right. If there are precedents of denying free speech to right-wingers, the prosecutors, courts, etc., will jump at the chance to apply them to the left.... Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: Re: rich folks in prison {was: now you k... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: rich folks in prison {was: n... Jim Devine
- Re: rich folks in prison Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: rich folks in priso... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: rich folks in prison {was: n... michael
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: now you know JKSCHW
- Re: Re: now you know Michael Perelman
- re: now you know Timework Web
- Re: now you know Charles Brown
- Re: Re: now you know JKSCHW
- Re: now you know Jim Devine
- Re: now you know Charles Brown
- re: now you know Charles Brown
- Re: now you know Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: now you know Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: Re: now you know Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: now you know JKSCHW
- now you know Charles Brown
- Re: now you know Doug Henwood
- Re: now you know Jim Devine
- Re: Re: now you know Brad De Long
