En relaci�n a [PEN-L:1459] Re: Imperialist progressivism (was R,
el 8 Sep 00, a las 4:46, Brad De Long dijo:
>
>
> So Galtieri's strategy would have worked: the domestic opposition on
> the left would have forgotten his crimes and thrown their support
> behind his regime--if only he had won his war, and so distracted giddy
> minds with foreign quarrels.
The imperialist mind is strong. When the issue is that of socialist
revolution to win an anticolonial war he brings the fate of that
small individual, Galtieri -[long digression here] whose hands were
by the way, blood stained but less blood stained than the hands of
those (included many colleagues of our economist in California) who
opposed the war, and, for example, continued to pay the Foreign Debt
to England during the confrontation [end of long digression]-, as if
it mattered a dime. The only thing that Brad DeLong is interested in,
in fact, is a personal vendetta with a despicable rogue, not the
opening of a vast battlefield for socialism and revolution.
Progressive imperialism, not imperialist progressivism. The adjective
was misplaced.
N�stor Miguel Gorojovsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
