So Hillary Clinton says that Nader should be killed. (I know it's illegal for someone to physically threaten a member of the First Family, but what about vice-versa?) Thomas Friedman, seemingly the chief ideologist of the NY TIMES in this era of corporate globalization, thinks that old Ralph should be exiled to North Korea. Now given the way that Friedman psychoanalyzes Nader (as his colleague, Paul Krugman, also an expert on psychological diagnostics, also does) it seems more appropriate for the elite to recommend the old Soviet solution to dissidents: he should be put in a mental institution, if not a strait-jacket. Is that the wave of future scapegoating? Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine
