Ian wrote: >Just because Kant and his groupies called it the Enlightenment we 21st >centurions have to blindly follow his historico-taxonomical rot? What >Enlightenment? To paraphrase Snoopy, "acutally existing civilization is >overrated"! At least you knew what I was referring to, which was the point of using the term. I don't think it's worth spending a lot of energy arguing about the meanings of words, since they are usually pretty arbitrary and conventional. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: Question for the Lefties -- II Ken Hanly
- Re: Re: Question for the Lefties --... Michael Perelman
- Re: Bankruptcy David Shemano
- Question for the Lefties -- II David Shemano
- Re: Question for the Lefties -- II Dennis Robert Redmond
- Re: Re: Question for the Lefties --... Carrol Cox
- RE: Re: Re: Question for the L... Max Sawicky
- Re: Question for the Lefties -- II Jeffrey L. Beatty
- Re: Re: Question for the Lefties --... Jim Devine
- RE: Re: Re: Question for the L... Lisa & Ian Murray
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Questi... Jim Devine
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Questi... Lisa & Ian Murray
- language Jim Devine
- RE: language Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: RE: language -- off-li... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: RE: language -- of... Jim Devine
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Qu... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Question for the L... Jeffrey L. Beatty
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Question f... Jim Devine
- Re: Question for the Lefties Charles Brown
- Re: Question for the Lefties Timework Web
