Jim Devine wrote, >it's on the "cost of living" inflation rate, something that first appeared >in rudimentary form in pen-l a couple of years ago. The basic idea is that >if you include non-market aspects of the cost of living as part of a >measure of average prices (the actual price of buying the use-values >measured by real GDP), then the inflation rate has been higher than >even as measured by the old, non-bowdlerized, version of the CPI. Of >course, it's not a kind of inflation that's relevant to monetary policy, >but it's relevant to our real living standards. Sounds interesting. Could you expand a bit? Tom Walker Sandwichman and Deconsultant Bowen Island, BC
- Re: Re: Re: recent economic trends ALI KADRI
- Re: Re: Re: Re: recent economic trends Jim Devine
- Re: Re: recent economic trends J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: recent economic trends J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- RE: Re: Re: recent economic trends Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: Re: Re: Re: recent economic trends J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: recent economic trends Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: recent economic trends J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: RE: Re: Re: recent economic trends J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: recent economic trends Lisa & Ian Murray
- Re: Re: recent economic trends Tom Walker
- Re: Re: recent economic trends Jim Devine
- Re: recent economic trends Tom Walker
- Re: recent economic trends Tom Walker
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: recent economic trends J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: recent economic trends J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- accumulation Jim Devine
- RE: California energy crisis David Shemano
- Re: RE: California energy crisis Eugene Coyle
- Re: recent economic trends Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: recent economic trends J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.