What does the mid-60s have to do with it? They were there, and so was I, in
the mid-late 70s, when the class I described was given. The "not 'so'"
meant that they were both wrong, but not because of their ultra- and
anti-empiricist attitudes.
>From: "J. Barkley Rosser, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [PEN-L:7822] Re: Re: anecdotes
>Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:28:25 -0500
>
> Yes, in the mid-60s, Kuhn and Hempel were
>both at Princeton.
>Barkley Rosser
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Justin Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 2:00 PM
>Subject: [PEN-L:7812] Re: anecdotes
>
>
> >Yes, but not "so." --jks
> >
> >
> >>
> >>At 05:00 AM 2/6/01 +0000, you wrote:
> >>> Thomas Kuhn taught a class on philosophy of science at Tigertown
> >>>[Princeton?]. He was ill, and had to hand over the teaching to Carl
> >>>Hempel. The two were different as could be: Kuhn was ... of course very
> >>>anti-empiricist. Hempel was ... ultra-empiricist.
> >>
> >>so they were both wrong?
> >>
> >>Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> >>
> >
> >_________________________________________________________________
> >Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> >
> >
>
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
