Barkley Rosser says to Mat: >But, if my recommending you to be published >occurs in response to your having previously recommended >that I be published, then this may be the payoff of a social >reciprocity relation, certainly a cashing in of social capital in >the Bourdieu sense, if not in the Loury/Coleman/Putnam sense. What if we were to set up an academic Ponzi scheme? :) Why don't the theorists of "social capital" simply say that capitalism benefits from an optimal amount of nepotism, corruption, etc. (but not from too little or too much of them) for they lower transaction costs? Could I get the above published if it were mathematically formulated? :) Yoshie
- Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Social Capital J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Social Capital Charles Brown
- Social Capital Charles Brown
- RE: Social Capital Forstater, Mathew
- Social Capital Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- salience Jim Devine
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Social Capital J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- RE: Social Capital Yoshie Furuhashi
- RE: Social Capital Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: Social Capital J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Ken Hanly
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital Jim Devine
- Social Capital Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Social Capital J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
