[was: [PEN-L:9519] Re: Re: Socialism & American Workers (was Re: ergonomics, etc.)] >1. The left has to develop a nonsectarian party-building model. It is not >sufficient to work for socialism unless the "Leninist" model is dispensed >with. In my experience, the phrase "nonsectarian party-building" is an oxymoron. I'm all in favor of having leftist/socialist organizations, but the emphasis has to be on building the _popular movement_, not the party. The party has to be a means to that end, not an end in itself. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. phillp2
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, etc. Stephen E Philion
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: ergonomics, et... Ken Hanly
- Socialism & American Workers (was ... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (... Louis Proyect
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Worke... Louis Proyect
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (... Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Worke... Louis Proyect
- Re: "nonsectarian party-building&... Jim Devine
- Re: "nonsectarian party-building&... Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: "nonsectarian party-build... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: "nonsectarian party-build... Jim Devine
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Worke... J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Socialism & American W... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Socialism & Americ... J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Socialism & American Worke... Louis Proyect
- Re: Socialism & American Workers (... Nathan Newman