At 03:54 PM 3/27/01 -0500, you wrote: >although it is widely and deeply entrenched >out there that he did, Marx never labeled what he had >as a "labor theory of value." He always referred to the >"theory of value." or the "law of value." More importantly, it's important to distinguish between Ricardo's labor theory of prices and Marx's theory, which isn't really a theory of prices at all. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
- Re: Interesting new book? J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Interesting new book? Chris Burford
- Re: Re: Interesting new book? Jeffrey L. Beatty
- Re: Interesting new book? Jeffrey L. Beatty
- RE: Re: Interesting new book? michael pugliese
- Interesting new book? Keaney Michael
- Re: Interesting new book? Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Interesting new book? Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: Interesting new book? J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Interesting new book? J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Interesting new book? Jim Devine
- Interesting new book? Keaney Michael
- Interesting new book? Keaney Michael
- Re: Interesting new book? Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Interesting new book? J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Re: Re: Interesting new book? Louis Proyect
- The Con Flag Jim Devine
- Re: The Con Flag J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Re: Interesting new book? Timework Web
- Re: Re: Interesting new book? Chris Burford
- Re: Re: Re: Interesting new book? Jim Devine
