Re: Re: Re: Final words on Brenner/Wood

[Jim Devine]

Steve writes:
>Right, if you go back to Wood's devestating critique of analytical marxism
>("AM,  is it worth the candle?" or some such title)  in NLR
>about 15 years ago, she makes that point very clearly. She does the same
>in her recent writings too, especially in her essay on capitalist  markets
>as compulsory driven institutions in MR, namely that Brenner is the best
>of the analytical marxists precisely because he takes seriously the
>problem of class struggle and its critical role in history as well as the
>compulsory nature of capitalist markets.

and Brenner, unlike Roemer or Cohen, actually studies the world rather than 
simply concocting theories about it.

Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] & http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~JDevine