with this next email address, then switch to the next in a list of fifteen,
once this one burns.
Moral: don't bother to unsubscribe me. It won't work. As to bandwidth, give
me a break. The total is about a few K. And I think the general public out
there would like to hear of innovative approaches to evolution and critiques
of Darwinism. They are being kept in the dark. They are! And the left is as
bad as anyone else here.
Please note that I was completely done, and made thatvery clear, but then
discovered the thread 'gospel of the buddhas' had started, with no input
wanted from the source. My views were being completely misrepresented. That
was unfair. I was nearly done again. And Michael simply cut me off.
The question of the eonic effect tends to create an initial harsh reaction. I
am not excessively pushing this, please. A few posts, for which I am
grateful, and that was that.
Nor is it incomprehensible. I think the basic point is clear enough, and
noone wants to face the hard reality of a failed paradigm. Face it.
Anyway, let's skip the unsubscribe act. NOT! I am done anyway. I hope that,
at least, some of those who suspect a problem with Darwinian sociobiology
will find my work useful, and also be forewarned at this additional
demonstration of what happens to critics. Don't be intimidated by the
academic crowd, they are losing control here, and they are afraid.
In a message dated 6/10/2001 11:52:24 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>John, I do not see you as an enemy at all. I do not understand most of
>what you write, but I suspect that you are on our side most of the way.
>
>My problem has to do with your style. Rather than engage in discussions
>on ongoing threads, you keep going back to your theory which remains
>incomprehensible to me. Doing so takes up bandwith. Many people outside
>of the US pay be the amount of stuff that they get.
Exactly. Every time John posts, up comes the eonic effect. I'd like to hear
his views
without him always mentioning eonica. For example, what does John think
about the
prospects of future income of a child who grows up in an impoverished
household in the
US or the UK?
