Jim Devine: >The mocking of concepts (such as real vs. formal subsumption) is >anti-intellectual, as you point out. Unfortunately, as I have pointed out repeatedly, just because Hardt and Negri use the word subsumption or alienation or imperialism or class or labor or dialectics or revolution or communism, it does not mean that they use it in the same sense that Marxists use it. When you read "Empire", you will figure this out at once. Anybody who describes Spinoza as a "communist" has to be taken with a ton of salt. Louis Proyect Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org
- Anti-Intellectualism, Pure and Simple, Formal and Real LeoCasey
- Re: Anti-Intellectualism, Pure and Simple, Formal an... Louis Proyect
- Re: Anti-Intellectualism, Pure and Simple, Formal an... Jim Devine
- Re: Anti-Intellectualism, Pure and Simple, Forma... Louis Proyect
- Re: Anti-Intellectualism, Pure and Simple, Formal an... LeoCasey
- Re: Re: Anti-Intellectualism, Pure and Simple, F... Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Anti-Intellectualism, Pure and Simple,Fo... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Anti-Intellectualism, Pure and S... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Anti-Intellectualism, Pu... Michael Perelman
- Re: Anti-Intellectualism, Pure and Simple, Formal an... LeoCasey
- Re: Re: Anti-Intellectualism, Pure and Simple, F... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Anti-Intellectualism, Pure and Simple,Fo... Michael Pugliese
