How can we ever imagine succeeding in effecting large-scale social
transformation if tiny factions of 'radical' and 'marxist' economists
cannot work out their petty differences without bankrupting one of the
only organizations and journals that provide an outlet for papers and
presentations for left political economy? and where is the leadership
that should have been able to step in and mediate some resolution? for
all my differences with the late David Gordon, I don't think he would
have sat around and watched urpe go bankrupt from something like this.
it doesn't matter who is 'right'--we're all going to lose if this
doesn't get settled. no wonder so many people give up on left politics.
-----Original Message-----
From: Max Sawicky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 8:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:15335] RE: Re: URPE circular letter about Andrew Kliman
there's really no way for a third party
to tell who is right or wrong, so more
details wouldn't help.
My suggestion is for both sides to agree
on mediation as a substitute for litigation.
Whoever refuses would then be defined as in
the wrong.
mbs
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew Hagen
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:51 PM
To: Alan Freeman; OPE-L list; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PEN-L:15326] Re: URPE circular letter about Andrew Kliman
Either tell us exactly what the so-called "unethical professional
conduct" exactly was, or don't bring this up in a public forum.
Andrew Hagen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
