GMB slashes Labour cash 

Kevin Maguire
Wednesday July 18, 2001
The Guardian

Tony Blair's drive to privatise public services provoked its first concrete
backlash yesterday when the GMB union slashed its
funding of the Labour party by �1m. 

The general workers' union, one of the biggest affiliated to the party, is
to cut support by �250,000 a year over the next four years
in protest at the prime minister's uncompromising stand. 

Financial support for MPs in 100 constituencies, which each received around
�5,000 at the last election, is also to be reviewed in a
move which could see leadership loyalists punished. 

Other unions are threatening to follow the GMB's line as opposition grows
over government proposals to extend the private finance
initiative and invite firms to provide health and education services where
Mr Blair believes they would be more effective than the
public sector. 

Unison, Britain's biggest union which pays Labour �1.36m a year, is
reviewing its links with the party and intends to launch a
campaign to fight the proposals. 

The slogan "Sign up to Unison's campaign to keep public services public" is
to be hung from a bridge during the party's annual
conference in Brighton. 

GMB officials said the union's traditionally loyalist 80-strong executive
voted unanimously to reduce funding by �1m and reduce its
affiliation level after Mr Blair claimed on Monday it was "reform or bust"
for public services. 

"I did not spend four weeks standing on doorsteps, ringing bells and
delivering leaflets to be stabbed in the back," said an
executive member. 

The GMB, which has 750,000 members, will reduce funding from �650,000 a year
to �400,000 with the difference to be spent on
harrying Mr Blair and ministers with rallies, adverts and protest postcards.


A Labour aide claimed the union would undermine its influence over the party
as a result. 

The government also faced opposition yesterday from backbench Labour MPs as
they queued up in the Commons to savage the
plans. 

David Taylor, MP for Leicestershire NW, said: "PFI truly is prohibitive in
cost, flawed in concept and intolerable in consequence for
taxpayers, citizens and workers." 

Kelvin Hopkins, MP for Luton North, said PFI was "irrational nonsense" that
was less popular than the poll tax, while Hackney
North colleague Diane Abbott criticised the government's "obsessively
ideological approach". 

Full article at:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/guardianpolitics/story/0,3605,523429,00.html

Michael Keaney
Mercuria Business School
Martinlaaksontie 36
01620 Vantaa
Finland

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to