Doug Henwood wrote: > In the second half of the 19th century, the U.S. was in recession or > depression or panic about half the time. Violent booms alternated > with violent busts. The proletariat was surly and rebellious and even > the bourgeoisie wasn't happy with the situation. Is that what we > should go back to? > But it's only a few days since you told us that's what we *are* going back to: >>Because it's more of a 19th century slowdown than a post-WW II one, with a financial hangover from the burst Nasdaq/tech bubble, and a real sector one from overinvestment in gadgets. It's probably going to take some time to work through it.<< [pen-l13799] Mark Jones
- RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: gas Mark Jones
- RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: gas David Shemano
- Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: gas Doug Henwood
- gold & god Jim Devine
- RE: gold & god Mark Jones
- Re: RE: gold & god Jim Devine
- RE: gold & god David Shemano
- Re: gold & god Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: RE: gold & god Jim Devine
- Re: RE: gold & god Doug Henwood
- Re: gold & god Mark Jones
- Re: gold & god Yoshie Furuhashi
- RE: Re: RE: gold & god David Shemano
- Re: gas Yoshie Furuhashi
- Re: Re: gas Jim Devine
- Re: RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: gas Eugene Coyle
- Re: RE: gas Ian Murray
- RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: gas David Shemano
- Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: gas Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: gas Jim Devine
- Wanniski David Shemano
