This article from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]


The Search for Intelligent Life on the Internet

September 23, 2001 

By AMY HARMON


 

AT a moment when the world's need for information has never
been greater, the Internet's role as the ultimate source of
unmediated news has been matched only by its notorious
ability to breed rumors, conspiracy theories and urban
legends. 

If you have an e-mail account, you are almost certainly
familiar by now with the 1654 quotation from Nostradamus
"predicting" the attack on the World Trade Center, which
has been circulating and recirculating since the Sept. 11
terrorist attacks. 

You have surely seen the face of Satan in the pictures of
the smoke rising from the decimated twin towers. You may
even have stepped outside with a lighted candle at 10:30
p.m. one night last week in response to e-mail stating that
NASA planned to take a satellite picture as a memorial to
the attack victims. "Please pass this on to as many people
as possible," read the message (which turned out to be
bogus). 

The Internet has a long tradition of incubating rumors.
E-mail hoaxes have promised that the first 13,000 people to
forward a message would win cash or trips to Disneyworld;
sworn that the author Kurt Vonnegut advised new graduates
to "wear sunscreen" during a commencement speech he never
gave; and recounted the false story of a woman forced to
pay $250 for the Neiman Marcus chocolate chip cookie
recipe. 

But it may be a measure of just how much stranger truth has
come to seem than fiction that many Internet users �
including a number of normally cynical New Yorkers � are
having more difficulty telling online rumor from reality. 

Did Clear Channel Communications officially ban its
American radio stations from playing a long list of
potentially offensive songs including "Burning Down the
House" by the Talking Heads and the Beatles' "Ticket to
Ride"? Not exactly � it was a suggestion � but the question
was hotly debated on dozens of sober-minded Internet
discussion groups where the list was posted. 

Did an Afghan-American author named Tamim Ansary write an
essay decrying the notion of "bombing Afghanistan back to
the Stone Age" because "it's already been done?" Yes, but
the article � which Mr. Ansary e-mailed to a few friends �
appeared in so many inboxes that some recipients thought it
was a hoax. 

In a sign of the hunger to explain the inexplicable,
"Nostradamus" has joined "sex" and "mp3" on the list of
terms most frequently entered on Internet search engines,
as people scramble to learn more about the French
astrologer who wrote that "the third big war will begin
when the big city is burning" after "two brothers" are
"torn apart by Chaos." Others are stampeding to sites like
www.snopes2.com, which rates current rumors green, red and
yellow depending on whether they are deemed to be true,
false or undetermined. 

Still, the incessant blending of fact and fantasy on the
Web looks a lot like a venerable response to tragedy in a
slightly new form, according to people who have studied the
origin of rumors and urban legends. The need to arrive at a
common understanding of a disaster � and to forge a united
front to deal with it � often leads to an outpouring of
theories that may or may not be true. 

Indeed, conspiracy theorists did just fine without the
Internet in the decades following the assassination of John
F. Kennedy. The difference with the Internet is that the
rumors are more plentiful and mutate much more quickly in a
global game of telephone. 

"When somebody thinks they have a piece of information in a
disaster they want to tell everyone they know to bring
everyone into a consensual reality," said Camille
Bacon-Smith, editor of the online journal New Directions in
Folklore. "They want to bring everyone into the group, and
with the Internet the group is huge." 

Sometimes the swirling bits of misinformation can be
exasperating. But sometimes they may simply express a
collective sense of hope. Did a man trapped on the 82nd or
71st or 100th floor of the collapsing World Trade Center
ride the falling debris to safety? Probably not, according
to snopes2.com, where the rumor is coded yellow, "but at
this point in time, it's still not known." 

Here are some recent rumors culled from e-mail lists and
Web sites. Answer true or false to test your grip on
reality. 

1. A body with bound hands was found atop one of the
buildings near the former World Trade Center towers. 

2. CNN used old footage of Palestinians dancing in the
street after the terrorist attack. 

3. The television evangelist Jerry Falwell said civil
liberties groups, feminists, homosexuals and abortion
rights supporters bear partial responsibility for the
attacks because their actions have turned God's anger
against America. 

4. Following the attacks, a prominent Canadian broadcaster
declared that "it is time to speak up for the Americans as
the most generous and possibly the least- appreciated
people on all the earth." 

5. The number 11 comes up a lot. For instance, the attack
was on 9/11, and 9+1+1=11. Also, New York City, Afghanistan
and the Pentagon each has 11 letters. The twin towers,
standing side by side, looked like the number 11. And so
on. 

6. The planned cover for a hip-hop album due to be released
in November depicted an exploding World Trade Center. 

7. Typing NYC into a Microsoft Word document, highlighting
it and changing the font to Webdings reveals a positive
message. 


1. True. 2. False. 3. True (Falwell later retracted the
statement). 4. Mostly false (Gordon Sinclair's defense of
America was delivered in 1973). 5. True, perhaps. 6. True.
7. True: N
=

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/23/weekinreview/23HARM.html?ex=1002264836
&ei=1&en=bdda81f641980399



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters 
or other creative advertising opportunities with The 
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson 
Racer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media 
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company


Reply via email to