I don't really mind when Doug riffs a cheap shot about gloating off one of my posts. I don't really mind when Doug doesn't respond to my substantive reply to his cheep shot. But when, after ignoring my reply, he fires off a cheap shot about catechism under the "not good" subject heading, it hurts my feelings. Tom Walker Bowen Island, BC 604 947 2213
- Re: Not good Tom Walker
- Re: Re: Not good Ian Murray
- Re: Not good Doug Henwood
- Not Good Charles Brown
- Re: Not Good Steve Diamond
- Re: Not good Doyle Saylor
- Re: Not good Tom Walker
- Re: Re: Not good Mark Jones
- Re: Re: Re: Not good Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Not good Mark Jones
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not good Tom Walker
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Not good Rob Schaap
- Re: Re: Re: Not good Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Not good Eugene Coyle
- Re: Re: Re: Not good Doug Henwood
- Re: : Not good Gar Lipow
- Re: Re: Re: Not good Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Not good Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Not good Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Not good Mark Jones
- Re: Not good Carrol Cox
