[the Independent]
Miles Kington:

Love is all you need (to kill your enemies)

'President Putin doesn't know it yet, but I think American support
will prove his death warrant'
23 October 2001
The news that President Bush may have given the go-ahead for Osama bin
Laden to be assassinated has brought despair to Professor Steve
Inkermann.

"Here we go again," says Professor Inkermann. "Do we never learn?"

He puts his head in his hands and weeps silently for a moment. Then he
looks up and answers his own question.

"No, we never learn," he says.

And the professor should know.

He is, after all, chief strategist at Ishapw - shorthand for the
internationally respected think tank, The Institute for the Study of
How America got the Plot Wrong. A government-funded body, formed to
think the unthinkable and wonder out loud why America fails when it
does fail, it's like a medieval court jester without the jokes.

"Ever since I can remember," says the professor, "America has believed
that if you remove public enemy No 1, you have solved your problem.
There are only two objections. One, it does not solve anything,
because you then get another public enemy No 1 replacing the old one.
Two, we never seem able to manage an assassination that actually does
get rid of enemy No 1. Remember we were once going to rub out Castro
under the Kennedys? A poisoned pen or back-firing cigar or something?
Correct me if I am wrong, but Castro is still going strong and the
Kennedys are all gone. In fact, correct me again if I'm wrong, but the
Kennedys were assassinated and Castro was not. This was what we in the
trade call getting the plot wrong. Really wrong."

But surely if they did manage to get rid of Osama bin Laden, the
problem would be over? Wouldn't it?

Professor Inkermann stares into the distance. He has heard this all
before.

"Over the years," he says, explaining it very simply as he has no
doubt had to explain things to successive uncomprehending presidents,
"we have always been enthralled by the idea, gleaned from too many
Westerns, that if you rub out the chief baddy, peace is restored. If
Wyatt Earp can kill the Clancy brothers, if Jesse James can be wiped
out, then everything will be lovely in the garden again. If the Garden
of Eden had been an American scenario, then Adam would have tried to
shoot it out with the serpent. Trouble is, knowing our luck, he would
have shot Eve by mistake..."

But surely the US generally gets what it wants? It's not often on the
losing side?

"It's always on the losing side when it comes to public enemy No 1.
Think of all the big bad guys that the Americans have sworn to get rid
of. Think of Colonel Gaddafi. Think of Saddam Hussein. Think of
Ayotollah Khomeini. Think of Castro. We have sworn to get rid of all
of them, and they are all still here, with the exception of Kim Il
Sung, who was replaced by a clone, and Khomeini, who died of old age.
Got tired waiting to be assassinated, I expect.

"You might almost say that for America to say a leader should be got
rid of is a guarantee he will stay in power for a long time. Look at
it the other way round. What about world leaders we thoroughly
approved of and wanted to stay in power? Like the Shah? President
Marcos? Pinochet? What happened to them? We supported them and it was
their undoing. American support is the kiss of death. American
opposition is the kiss of life. Therefore..."

This is where Professor Inkermann starts thinking the unthinkable.

"Therefore we should start loving our enemies. Not only is it what we
are told to do in the Bible, but it's the only way to get rid of them.
I have recently managed to persuade the State Department to try, just
as an experiment, cosying up to Vladimir Putin. They have started.
Putin doesn't know it yet, but I think US support will be his death
warrant."

And bin Laden? Should America think the ultimate unthinkable and
embrace him? Should America hold out the hand of peace to the Taliban?
It is, after all, the ultimate logical conclusion of his argument.
That we can only destroy them by taking them on as friends.

"I don't know," says Professor Inkermann, brooding. "Maybe it's a step
too far, to go to bin Laden, and say 'Howdy, come round for drinks'.
Maybe... Still, it's going to be interesting to see what happens to
Blair."

Blair?

"Sure. Right now, we love Blair. Just as we loved the Shah and Marcos
and all our other vanished allies. So it'll be interesting to see how
long he can outlast the curse of American friendship. don't you
think?"

Very interesting indeed.

Reply via email to