Quick, everyone run for the hills :-) Ian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Forstater, Mathew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:23 PM Subject: [PEN-L:22132] RE: Re: Re: query: Historical Materialism
Would one of those important and true insights be that the value contributed by labor power to the product of labor power exceeds the value paid to labor by capital for its contribution? -----Original Message----- From: Justin Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 4:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L:22131] Re: Re: query: Historical Materialism > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >I subscribe "Historical materialism" I think that its weakness is >inadequate& insufficient analysis of fundamental category of Marx's >analysis >of value-form and labor theory. > It's analytical Marxist. Most AMs, like me, do not believe that Marx's value theory is more than a heuristic, and think that the important and true insights in Marx can be stated without the labor theory of value. jks _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
