> >Are you following Blaug to accept Popperian > >falsification, a criterion that makes _all_ social science > (or almost all) worthless? > > Not quite all social science: the social science of > astrology makes twelve > falsifiable predictions every morning in my newspaper and > thus qualifies as > a science on Popperian grounds.
hey, if you read the astrological forecast in THE ONION, you'll find that the predictions always come true! (see http://www.theonion.com/onion3804/index.html) JD
