I'm sorry Michael but I must respond to Kliman's message. Andrew Kliman is lying. Again.
His message contained a clear threat to initate legal action against me. Any reasonable person would read it that way. That is how Andrew intended for it to be taken; that is how I took it. Why else would Kliman send a message to me- -to ask how my family is doing? It is disingenuous for him to claim otherwise. Andrew appears to argue that simply because he did not use the phrase "I will initate legal action against you" he has not threatened to do so. But if a policeman stops you and _claims_ that you drove through a stop sign and gives details about exactly how you drove through the stop sign he is not simply making conversation. Kliman would argue that the policeman is simply chatting when he _claims_ you drove through a stop sign and that the motorist who was was told this would never even consider that the policeman might actually issue a citation for driving through a stop sign. I will try, as much as possible, to no longer respond to Kliman's lies. Eric Nilsson
