Exactly. Hobbes had a long bitter dispute with John Wallis, an eminent
mathematician, on the issue. While many of Hobbes' arguments were so
evidently fallacious that most mathematicians simply ignored Hobbes, Wallis
thought it important to refute him because the concepts Hobbes used were
relevant to his social ideas as well, ideas that Wallis thought it important
to oppose. Hobbes actually wrote several treatises on the subject and
refused to recognise his errors. There is a whole book on the issue. It is
reviewed at this link:

http://www.maa.org/reviews/squaring.html

Here is a paragraph from the review. Only death in his nineties stopped
Hobbes' flow of fallacies and invective!

The vociferous public quarrel between the philosopher Thomas Hobbes
(1588-1679) and the mathematician John Wallis (1616-1703) was a strange and
unpleasant episode in the history of mathematics. In his De Corpore of 1655,
Hobbes claimed quadrature of the circle, rectification of curvilinear arcs,
and solutions of other outstanding geometric problems. Wallis replied in the
same year with Elenchus Geometriae Hobbianae, in which he pointed out the
many errors and generally deplorable state of Hobbes' geometry. This
unleashed a continuing exchange of rebuttal and invective lasting until the
end of Hobbes' life. Some of the flavor of the dispute can be gleaned from
such titles as Hobbes' Six Lessons to the Professors of the Mathematiques
(the other Oxford professor in the fray was Seth Ward, Savilian Professor of
Astronomy), Wallis' Due Correction for Mr. Hobbes ... for not saying his
Lessons right, or Hobbes' Markes of the Absurd Geometry, Rural Language,
Scottish Church-Politicks, and Barbarismes of John Wallis.



Cheers, Ken Hanly
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 11:56 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:24242] Re: RE: Re: Re: RE: Nash, Harsanyi and Selten


>
>
> >
> >
> >That would be *quadrature* of the circle (constructing a line equal in
> >length to the circumference of any given circle).  Squaring circles is
> >impossible.
> >
> >
>
> Ken's joke is that Hobbes didn't believe this, he thought he had squared
the
> circle.
>
> jks
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.
>

Reply via email to