On 2002.04.16 07:28 AM, "Ian Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sabri Oncu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "PEN-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 3:11 PM > Subject: [PEN-L:24950] Re: Binary scheme of democracy and centralism > > >> Miyachi wrote: >> >>> From the viewpoint of Stalinism, the content of >>> centralization of power is not considered as a pair >>> of centralization of leadership and decentralization >>> of responsibility, but only centralization of leadership >>> has been put forward. >> >> Dear Miyachi, >> >> I have served at a few of the most Stalinist institutions in the >> world: US financial corporations. They talked about >> centralization of leadership and decentralization of >> responsibility incessantly. This is the way the US financial >> corporations are organized and I doubt that non-financial >> corporations are significantly different. Responsibility without >> authority is one of the most painful experiences I have ever had, >> where, in this context, with authority I mean ability to make >> decisions. >> >> What is the point of decentralized responsibility if those who >> are responsible have no ability to make decisions? >> >> Best, >> Sabri > ================= > > To protect the leadership. It's called the musical chairs theory of > unaccountability. > > Ian > Thank you for your reply As for decentralized responsibility, party cell duty is regular report to central committee and maintain party's program. If he has not ability to this duty, simply he must give up, or choose to change his duty. Here no command exists. Only member's will and passion is required. In a sense This type of organization is network-type like Al-Qaeda. On the contrary, for example, in US financial corporations as you, You may decision business yourself, but you must seek profit in decentralized responsibility. If you fail to raise profit, you fire. It is the difference between party and corporation. In reality you obey corporations as unpaid worker but wage form of payment hide this ruler-ruled relationship. Below is from "Capital" The wage-form thus extinguishes every trace of the division of the working-day into necessary labour and surplus-labour, into paid and unpaid labour. All labour appears as paid labour. In the corv�e, the labour of the worker for himself, and his compulsory labour for his lord, differ in space and time in the clearest possible way. In slave 1abour, even that part of the working-day in which the slave is only replacing the value of his own means of existence, in which, therefore, in fact, he works for himself alone, appears as labour for his master. All the slave's labour appears as unpaid labour. [8] In wage labour, on the contrary, even surplus-labour, or unpaid labour, appears as paid. There the property-relation conceals the labour of the slave for himself; here the money-relation conceals the unrequited labour of the wage labourer. Hence, we may understand the decisive importance of the transformation of value and price of labour-power into the form of wages, or into the value and price of labour itself. This phenomenal form, which makes the actual relation invisible, and, indeed, shows the direct opposite of that relation, forms the basis of all the juridical notions of both labourer and capitalist, of all the mystifications of the capitalistic mode of production, of all its illusions as to liberty, of all the apologetic shifts of the vulgar economists. If history took a long time to get at the bottom of the mystery of wages, nothing, on the other hand, is more easy to understand than the necessity, the raison d' etre, of this phenomenon. The exchange between capital and labour at first presents itself to the mind in the same guise as the buying and selling of all other commodities. The buyer gives a certain sum of money, the seller an article of a nature different from money. The jurist's consciousness recognizes in this, at most, a material difference, expressed in the juridically equivalent formula: "Do ut des, do ut facias, facio ut des, facio ut facias." [9] Regards MIYACHI TATSUO Psychiatric Department Komaki municipal hosipital 1-20.JOHBUHSHI KOMAKI CITY AICHI PREF. 486-0044 TEL:0568-76-4131 FAX 0568-76-4145 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
