Not only are you posting all out of proportion to the daily per capita on pen-l, your posts are filled with misspellings. This suggests to me that you are dashing things off rather than giving questions the attention they deserve. This appears to be a misuse of electronic communications. I would strongly advise you to eschew tit-for-tat replies, which at this point simply amount to repeated professions of your core beliefs. For example, in your reply to Doug Henwood, you state, "There was precious little variety under actual planning. Markers [sic] both create and destroy variety." Do you think this adds anything to our knowledge or understanding at this point? Repeating things like this ad infinitum, ad nauseum remind me of the sort of interventions heard on Marxism lists of yore. People thought that by repeating things like "without a revolutionary party, there can be no revolution" they were making some sort of contribution to Marxist theory. All they were doing was cheapening the discussion.
Louis Proyect Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org
