but surprising that a significant media head should admit it. From the Press
Gazette (UK)

Cheers, Ken Hanly

CNN chief claims US media 'censored' war

By Julie Tomlin

Posted 15 August 2002 12:00 GMT



Golden: "a reluctance to criticise"

US news organisations "censored" their coverage of the US campaign in
Afghanistan in order to be in step with public opinion in the wake of the
September 11 terrorist attacks, a CNN senior executive has claimed.

Coverage of the war in Afghanistan was shaped by the level of public support
that existed for US action, Rena Golden, the executive vice-president and
general manager of CNN International claimed.

Speaking at Newsworld Asia, a conference for news executives in Singapore,
Golden said: "Anyone who claims the US media didn't censor itself is kidding
you. It wasn't a matter of government pressure but a reluctance to criticise
anything in a war that was obviously supported by the vast majority of the
people.

"And this isn't just a CNN issue -every journalist who was in any way
involved in 9/11 is partly responsible." Senior figures from Afghanistan and
Pakistan criticised Western news organisations which flooded the region with
journalists, who were unfamiliar with its politics and history.

Major General Rashid Quereshi, chief media advisor to Pakistan's president,
General Pervez Musharraf, spoke during a debate on whether Western news
coverage undermined the Government's ability to balance its support for the
anti-terror campaign and the hostility of its Muslim people.

He told delegates that at one stage there had been 3,500 foreign journalists
in the country "many of whom knew nothing about the country or its problems"
.

The presence of so many journalists caused "serious difficulties for a
Government determined not to impose press restrictions on the media", he
claimed.

APTN chief Ian Ritchie agreed: "If journalists are to have objectivity, they
first need to understand."

CNN New Delhi chief Satinder Bindra also backed claims that by pushing
"harder than they should for a story" some journalists endangered other
colleagues in the field.

"One of many totally untrained journalists I encountered was determined to
get closer to the front - close enough to see the Taliban frontline," said
Bindra. "I told him that if we could see the Taliban, they could see us, and
they'd shoot us. For what purpose? There was no story, no good picture, but
because this guy wanted to make a name for himself we all had to follow,
just in case."




Reply via email to