For the debate on health care!

Here's what's influencing Ontario health-care policy    By Michele
Landsberg

The Star                   Oct. 20, 2002.

IF PUBLIC policies don�t seem to make sense to you, then you�re just not
paying attention. Everything that seems downright irrational, wasteful,
destructive and reckless in the Ontario government�s approach to health
care really does make sense if you consider all the available
information.
For example: For-profit hospitals are a medical danger zone. A study
done at McMaster medical school showed that death rates are higher at
for-profit hospitals, which must wring their profits out of health care
by skimping on skilled staff. Private-profit hospitals, they showed, cut
their expenditures by 10 to 15 per cent. Some patients pay with their
lives. And yet Health Minister Tony Clement is pushing ahead with the
building of two for-profit hospitals in Brampton and Ottawa. Senseless?
No. Stay tuned for a very commonsensical explanation.
Another example: If it makes you a little queasy to think of being in a
life-and-death situation while hospital management calculates how much
money it can skim from your treatment, just consider this. The first
private-public-partnership hospital built in Britain was so shoddily
constructed that sewage flooded the operating room and ceilings
collapsed in the maternity unit. Meanwhile, beds were cut by 30 per cent
and clinical staff budgets by 20 per cent.
Doesn�t make sense yet? Wait, it will.
For-profit health care is costlier to the public and does not eliminate
waiting lists. Prime example: the privatized cancer-care clinic at
Sunnybrook. No less an observer than the provincial auditor said that
waiting lists were not shortened and the costs to the public were
higher. Home care in Ontario is the most privatized in Canada. I don�t
have to repeat here the litany of ugliness: Plummeting standards,
shrinking staff, lowest quality of care and least amount of rehab and
nursing care, and yet Ontario has the oldest and sickest patients in
long-term care in the country. And the costs for this accommodation are
among Canada�s highest.
The once-public labs in our hospitals have disappeared into the giant
maw of the private lab industry. Anyone notice any decrease in public
costs or improvement in service?  So how can all this mess be an example
of rational decision-making?
Scholars like York University political scientist Robert MacDermid as
well as the National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE) have
long pored over the public records to find the explanation. You could
sum it up with a gaggle of old folk wisdom: He who pays the piper, calls
the tune. You scratch my back, I�ll scratch yours. Where there�s smoke,
there�s fire.
Look at the record of campaign contributions to the Ontario
Conservatives between 1995 and 1999. MacDermid pointed out last year, in
an interview with CBC�s Marketplace, that one big long-term care
company, CPL REIT (owned, he said, by the Reichmans) gave more than
$22,000 to the Tories and received contracts to build 1,667 beds, with a
potential of $1.3 billion in government subsidies over 20 years. Smart
investing. The same was true of nursing home giant Extendicare ($36,727)
which got contracts worth $700 million in the long run.
More recently, NUPGE took a beady-eyed look at donations to the
leadership campaigns of Premier Ernie Eves and Clement. It�s all a
matter of public record: some of the juiciest gifts to Eves� campaign
were from the private health-care sector. The Dynacare Health Group, the
largest private  laboratory company in Ontario, gave Eves $25,000. RBC
Dominion Securities� Tony Fell, the privatizing chair of the University
Health Network, coughed up $10,000. Canadian Medical Laboratories Ltd.,
which provides lab tests and medical imaging services (private MRI
clinics, anyone?) gave $10,000. Clement, as the health minister who says
he �makes no apology on the issue of for-profit versus not-for-profit,�
was rolling in unapologetic donations from private medical industries.
KMH Cardiology and Diagnostic Centres (private testing and lab work)
gave $11,000. Gamma-Dynacare Medical Labs covered all its bases by
giving $10,000 to Clement on top of the money it gave to Eves. A very
handsome $43,568 came from Olympia and York Properties, a major
shareholder in Retirement Residences Real Estate Investment Trust (Ernie
Eves, former trustee), which has 185 facilities. Central Park Lodges and
Versa-Care (which kicked in a separate $5,000) are divisions of the
trust.
The list of pharmaceutical companies that donated to Clements� campaign
is headed by GlaxoSmithKline for $11,620. The cash total from
pharmaceuticals and drug store chains was $70,520.
The list goes on and on � optometrists, eye laser clinics, medical
equipment manufacturers, Nestle Corporation�s vision care labs. Money
talks, and privatized medical care has the loudest voice in this race to
undermine medicare before the Romanow Commission can make its report
next month.
Democracy isn�t supposed to work this way. We�re all supposed to be on
an equal footing in choosing our governments and our way of life.
�Medicare was a huge victory for the public will,� commented Mike Luff,
national representative of NUPGE. �The doctors, the drug companies, the
insurance                   companies all fought it, but the people
wanted it and won." Now, however,  some of those wealthy privatizing
interests, having once lost the battle to stymie medicare, are trying a
quieter, back-door route.
We're at fault, too: we've all become so accustomed to this potentially
corrupt process that many of us are too cynical to bother fighting it.
There's been far more flap � constant headline stories and letters to
the editor, in fact � about the expense account sleaze of steak-chomping
Tory MPPs than there has been about the far more fundamental scandal of
big corporate money used to skew public policies in the hopes of private
profit. There is an antidote to this enervating cycle of disillusion and
apathy. Dozens of citizen groups are now organizing, using the Internet
to publish their bracing and figures, and rallying citizens to fight
back while there's still a chance.
For a healing jolt of informed activism, check into
http://www.ontariohealthcoalition.ca or http://www.nupge.ca and do a
search for "Ernie Eves" or, for a scary report on the privatizing
giants, called "Waiting in the Wings," see
http://www.polarisinstitute.org/

Michele Landsberg's column usually appears in The Star Saturday and
Sunday. Her e-mail address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to