Louis Proyect wrote:
>>Again, Johnson specifically argues against the view that biology
>>determines some sort of "eternal nature of things." And Chomsky, as I
>>read him, isn't hostile to revolution _per se _ as much as a certain
>>kind of revolution, imposed by a political party with monopoly control
>>over the state, etc. (Stalinism and the like).
>
>More Stalin-baiting from Jim Devine.
Since when is a statement of fact "baiting"?
Michael, would you please clarify your discursive standards for PEN-L?
Doug
You misunderstood the revolution in the mode of production or rather the material power of the productive forces.
Melvin P.
