Although the USA has not admitted it, there is every likelihood that it
destroyed Baghdad's electrical power station with the intention of
making life unlivable. Today's newspapers are filled with reports that
they intend to keep the city encircled while delivering punishing air
strikes against the "enemy". In many ways, the scenario is beginning to
look like Waco. In chiding critics of the war, Rush Limbaugh was quoted
as saying that it took 51 days to storm David Koresh's followers, so why
should we be impatient with Iraq.
Ironically, the crusade to liberate Waco was a humanitarian intervention
project from the same Clinton administration that liberated Yugoslavia.
Whatever ideological differences they had over abortion, the Bush
foreign policy seems fairly consistent with what came before it. I have
begun reading Diana Johnstone's "Fool's Crusade" and am more convinced
than ever that the failure of the left to take a strong stand against
NATO's mauling of Yugoslavia facilitated the new hegemonic drive of the
USA. The melting of all resistance to the war in Iraq from France and
Germany reminds us that this is basically an imperialist onslaught of
the North against the South. Whatever the final outcome with the siege
of Baghdad, the prognosis is continuing war and continuing resistance.
--
The Marxism list: www.marxmail.org
- Re: Laying siege Louis Proyect
- Re: Laying siege Robert Scott Gassler
- Re: Re: Laying siege Louis Proyect
