Obviously I'm sorry for that one then. dd
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 10:08:26 -0700, andie nachgeborenen wrote: > > but it's also > > quite annoying for us to be magisterially directed > > to > > read a 400-page doctoral thesis before we're allowed > > to > > have opinions. > > That's unfair. The mention of diss occurred in a > different context, where person who brought the topic > of social v. natural sciences did so in the broadest > possible way (saying that there was a big diff), and I > didn't suggest or even direct that he or anyone read > my opus, but mentioned its length by way of saying > that there was a lot to b esaid about this, most of > which might be beside the point unless one knew what > the specific question was; and I invited further > specific questions to which discussion of that sort > might be directed. Anyone who made the mistake of > reading my diss, by the way, hoping for insight into > the demarcation criterion, would mostly be > disppointed. Except in an oblique way I don't discuss > the issue. jks > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to > Outlook(TM). > http://calendar.yahoo.com
