> from: "Chilman, Walter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "Chilman, Walter" wrote: > >>Dear Michael... >> >>one notices, does not one, how the internet is getting loaded up with what >>should really be considered idle scraps of thought generally unconnected >>with anything meaningful and typically speaking of profound annoyance to >>someone doing honest research. You name is associated with at least one of >>those. >> >>http://csf.colorado.edu/mail/pen-l/ >> >>and therefore as one empties his wastebasket from time to time, or even >>flushes his toilet, why not take this bit of crap off the internet for the >>benefit of other people. >> >>Ivan Hild >
its a pity he has not applied his advice to his own idle scraps of thought! btw, is his name chilman or hild?
It looks as if he's a little dimwitted, using a pseudonym and forgetting that he has a from address that identifies him. Probably the influence of Outhouse which like to hide those things lest the user's eyes burn out. I'm not seeing anything in his headers to indicate that he forged the address, pretending to be Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] If it's a forgery, it's pretty dang good what with the Message-id header:
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At any rate, Hild and Chilman have both posted or had things posted about them which identify their residence as Falls Church, VA. This, of course, isn't proof that they are one and the same or that the Ivan Hild comments, below, can be linked to Chilman. Nonetheless, for entertainment purposes only, this is what Ivan has had to say about the plague of "minorityism". If you search on "ivan hild" he's also written on the importance of modern welfare programs, but I don't get what the final crack about "minorities" means. Anyone? (can ya tell, I'm procrastinating!)
From Ivan Hild:
Sir - In the letters column of the February issue there was a lively and thoughtful discussion of why so many whites continue to favor offering privileges to racial minorities. The explanation seems simple: In years past, Anglo-Saxon Protestants, in their position of social and economic dominance, displayed such a brutal contempt for non-WASP whites that the latter have never gotten the foul taste of ethnic insult out of their mouths. Therefore, just at a time when whites have more than a little reason to pull together against the common threat, the preconditions for racial solidarity just aren't there.
One could argue that such historical abuses of whites by whites is a thing of the past and that bygones should be bygones. I wonder. It's still not difficult to an atmosphere of contempt for Italians, Slavs, and others in places like private country clubs, and an ethnic surname is still rare at the top rung of a corporation.
The sting of WASP exclusivism alone explains why immigrant ethnics of the 1930s voted with Jews and blacks for Franklin Roosevelt, why their children voted for JFK, and why, even today, America's urban working class still pulls the Democratic lever.
The problem is that whites in America - particularly upper level whites - have never extended their allegiance beyond their own subgroup. If white identity in this country fails to materialize (and it certainly looks anemic today), it will be because the dominant groups never played fair with the rest. This is the dirty little secret that goes far to explain why the nation continues to suffer the outrages of minorityism long past the point of reason.
Ivan Hild, Falls Church (VA)
http://www.commonsenseclub.com/pages/914issue/914issue.html
Letter From Washington: Rites of Spring Washington (DC) has celebrated its annual spring festival of youth, this year with a Latin theme. Half a thousand teen-agers, mostly El Salvadoran, spent several days rioting, fire-bombing, looting, and torching municipal vehicles in a neighborhood that was called Mount Pleasant by its long-ago middle-class white inhabitants. The event was hardly over when the greater Latino community of 30,000 or so erupted with demands for "social justice," denouncing the city's black political establishment for its alleged anti-Hispanic racism. In a city other than Washington, the minority tactic of torch and terrorize might have worked, but Washington is 70 percent black. The city fathers reacted rudely to the very extortion tactics that blacks have used on whites for decades.
Black politicos called the Central American stone-throwers "outrageous" and "irresponsible." A black DC councilman, H.R. Crawford, even suggested that the "undocumenteds" be deported. Blacks proceeded to raise anti-Hispanic grievances of their own, such as the fact that Latinos often vote Republican and seem to disappear disloyally into the white suburbs after one generation.
Washington, like Miami, has become a laboratory for the new, multi-racial America in which white people hardly play a role. Blacks and Hispanics are finding that the third-world paradise that was supposed to follow the unthroning of the white man isn't quite as it was advertised. Blacks, at any rate, are not likely to fall so easily for the shakedown tactics that they themselves have perfected. --Ivan Hild
http://www.commonsenseclub.com/pages/917issue/9107issue.html
