I think Tom Brass's work on "deproletarianisation" and unfree labour is
relevant here (cf/eg):

'... Brass (1990, 1992, 1997a) and Miles (1987) take an opposing view that
unfree relations are compatible with capitalism, comprising part of
capitalists' assault on the autonomy and wages of labour.  Brass has argued
that convict labour and indentured labour were subject to capitalist
exploitation.'  'Contract Labour and Bondage in Andhra Pradesh (India)1
Wendy K. Olsen and R.V. Ramana Murthy, Journal of Social and Political
Thought , Volume One, No. 2 | June 2000.
http://www.yorku.ca/jspot/2/wkolsenrvramana.htm

"A persistent issue...is the social content of bonded and other unfree
labour. Views of such labour as `pre-' or `non-'capitalist were challenged
by  the  argument  of  Tom  Brass  (1986b,  1990,  1997,  also  Brass  and
Bernstein  1992) that unfree labour `deproletarianization' is a
characteristic strategy of capitalist  restructuring  rather  than  an
index  of  a  `persistent'  pre-capitalism." Henry Bernstein And Terence J.
Byres, 'From Peasant Studies to Agrarian Change', Journal of Agrarian
Change, Vol. 1 No. 1, January  2001, pp.?
Http://www.blackwellpublishers.co.uk/pdf/JOAC1C001%20(2).pdf.


[And an attempt at a bibliography of Brass on deproletarianisation: ]

Brass,  Tom,  1980.  `Class  Formation  and  Class  Struggle  in  La
Convencion,  Peru'.  Journal of Peasant         Studies,   7 (4): 427­57.
Brass, Tom. (1986). "The Elementary Strictures of Kinship: Unfree Relations
and the Production of Commodities," in Social Analysis. No. 20.
Brass, Tom, 1986. `Cargos and Conflicts: The Fiesta System and Capitalist
Development in Eastern Peru'. JPS, 13 (3): 45­62.
Brass, Tom, 1986. `Unfree Labour and Capitalist Restructuring in the
Agrarian Sector:
   Peru and India'. JPS, 14 (1): 50­77.
Brass, Tom. (1990). "Class Struggle and Deproletarianisation of Agricultural
Labour in Haryana (India)," in Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 18,     No.
1. 36-67. Brass,  Tom,  1989.  `Trotskyism,  Hugo  Blanco  and  the
Ideology  of  a  Peruvian  Peasant Movement'. JPS, 16 (2): 173­67.
Brass, Tom, 1990. `Class Struggle and the Deproletarianisation of
Agricultural Labour in
   Haryana (India)'. JPS, 18 (1): 36­67.
Brass, Tom. (1991). "Market Essentialism and the Impermissibility of Unfree
Labour: A Reply to Shlomowitz," in Slavery and Abolition.
Vol.12, No. 3. 225-244.
Brass,  Tom,  1991.  `Moral  Economists,  Subalterns,  New  Social
Movements,  and  the (Re)Emergence of a (Post-)Modernised (Middle)
Peasant'. JPS, 18 (2): 173­205.
Brass, Tom, and Henry Bernstein. (1992). "Introduction: Proletarianisation
and Deproletarianisation on the Colonial Plantations," in Journal of
Peasant Studies. 19. 1-40.
Brass, T. (1993) "Some Observations on Unfree Labour, Capitalist
Restructuring, and Deproletarianization", pp. 31-50 of Brass, T., ed.,
    Conference on the History of Free and Unfree Labour, International
Institute for Social History, Amsterdam
Brass, Tom, ed., 1994a. New Farmers' Movements in India. JPS, 21 (3­4).
Brass, Tom, 1994b. `The Politics of Gender, Nature and Nation in the
Discourse of The
   New Farmers' Movements'. JPS, 21 (3­4): 27­71.
Brass, Tom, 1994c. `Post-script: Populism, Peasants and Intellectuals, or
What's Left of
   The Future'. JPS, 21 (3­4).
Brass, Tom. (1995). "Unfree Labour and Agrarian Change: A Different View,"
in Economic and Political Weekly. 1 April. 697-699.
Brass,  Tom,  1996/7.  `Popular  Culture,  Populist  Fiction(s):  The
Agrarian  Utopiates  of A.V. Chayanov, Ignatius Donnelly and Frank Capra'.
JPS, 24 (1­2): 153­90.
Brass, Tom. (1997a). "Some Observations on Unfree Labour, Capitalist
Restructuring and Deproletarianisation," in Brass and van der Linden,
eds. (1998). 57-76.
Brass,  Tom,  1997.  `The  Agrarian  Myth,  the  "New"  Populism  and  the
"New"  Right'. JPS, 24 (4): 201­45.
Brass, Tom, and Marcel van der Linden, eds. (1998). Free and Unfree Labour:
The Debate Continues. Berlin/Paris/Bern: Peter Lang AG.
Brass,  Tom,  1999.  Towards  a  Comparative  Political  Economy  of  Unfree
Labour.  London: Frank Cass.

Reply via email to