U.S. Administrator Imposes Flat Tax System on Iraq
By Dana Milbank and Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, November 2, 2003; Page A09


The flat tax, long a dream of economic conservatives, is finally getting
its day -- not in the United States, but in Iraq.

It took L. Paul Bremer, the U.S. administrator in Baghdad, no more than a
stroke of the pen Sept. 15 to accomplish what eluded the likes of
publisher Steve Forbes, Reps. Jack Kemp (R-N.Y.) and Richard K. Armey
(R-Tex.), and Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Tex.) over the course of a decade and two
presidential campaigns.

"The highest individual and corporate income tax rates for 2004 and
subsequent years shall not exceed 15 percent," Bremer wrote in Coalition
Provisional Authority Order Number 37, "Tax Strategy for 2003," issued
last month.

Voilą! Iraq has a flat tax, and the 15 percent rate is even lower than
Forbes (17 percent) and Gramm (16 percent) favored for the United States.
And, unless a future Iraqi government rescinds it, the flat tax will
remain long after the Americans have left.

"It's extremely good news," said Grover Norquist, head of Americans for
Tax Reform and a Bush administration ally. Bremer's vaguely worded edict
leaves open the possibility that Iraqis could face different levels of
taxation below 15 percent, but "they told me it's a flat rate and it
appears as though it's a flat rate," Norquist said. The tax fighter added:
"It might be a hint to the rest of us."

Bremer's new economic policy for Iraq will slash Saddam Hussein's top tax
rate for individuals and businesses from 45 to 15 percent. Of course,
since Hussein's government, like others in the Middle East, almost never
enforced tax collection, there is no real history of paying taxes in the
country.

During the more than three decades of Baath Party rule, Hussein ran a
centrally controlled economy with most large businesses owned or operated
by the state. The government also managed the import of most goods.

John B. Taylor, undersecretary of the Treasury for international affairs,
said the Iraq flat tax was discussed before the war as preliminary
planning was done with the help of some Iraqi exiles.

After major combat ended, the discussions continued with Iraqis in
Baghdad, with emphasis on tax policies adopted by other countries making
the transition from controlled economies. "One was Russia and subsequently
Ukraine, where we heard good things after flat taxes were adopted," Taylor
said.

On Sept. 22, Bremer told the Senate Appropriations Committee: "Iraq's new
tax system is admirably straightforward. The highest marginal tax rate on
personal and corporate income is 15 percent."

Iraq's new finance minister, Kamil Mubdir Gailani, is considered a
follower of Ahmed Chalabi, the Western-oriented banker who has closely
adhered to the Bush administration's economic policies, according to one
expert on the Iraqi economy. Gailani presented the new Iraq finance
program, including the flat tax, at a recent international meeting.

"A piece of social engineering is being done on Iraq, but it has almost no
support from other members of the U.S.-appointed Iraqi Governing Council,"
said a Middle East expert who heard Gailani's presentation.

Proponents of the flat tax have long favored this kind of tax system for
Iraq. Without much of a framework to start with, Iraq "need not worry
about all the political and transition problems that have made adoption of
fundamental tax reform here so difficult," Bruce Bartlett, an economist in
the Reagan and first Bush administrations, wrote this spring. "It is
gratifying, therefore, that leaders of the new Iraq are said to be looking
at a flat rate tax system for their country."

Bartlett, once an aide to Kemp and now with the National Center for Policy
Analysis, said the model for Iraq should be Russia, which in 2001 set a 13
percent flat tax on individual income. The Bush administration, still
disturbed by much higher tax rates here, has said it admires Russia's flat
tax. Russia "understands the importance of getting the tax structure right
in your economy," Commerce Secretary Donald L. Evans told the conservative
Heritage Foundation last year.

President Bush, in Russia last year to see President Vladimir Putin, said:
"The good news is that the flat tax in Russia is a good, fair tax -- much
more fair, by the way, than many Western countries, I might add."

One economist familiar with the area said: "At the previous 40 percent to
50 percent, Russian people were evading. Now at a lower rate, they are
paying because the penalties are so heavy."

Conservatives have similarly celebrated Bremer's move in Iraq. "Such low
rates will put Iraq on a par with Hong Kong and flat-tax-land Russia,"
editorialist Amity Shlaes wrote in the Financial Times. "They contrast
favorably with the onerous regimes of some neighbors."

American flat-tax advocates have made little headway at home, in part
because Democrats say it would disproportionately hurt lower-income
Americans and because expensive tax breaks such as the deductions for
mortgage interest and charitable donations are beloved in both parties.
But in places such as Russia, the Baltic states and Iraq, there was no
well-established tax code defended by an army of lobbyists. "Somehow, it's
easier when you start from scratch," Norquist said.

The 15 percent rate does not take effect until January. In the meantime,
Bremer has abolished all taxes except for real estate, car sales, gasoline
and the pleasantly named "excellent and first class hotel and restaurant
tax." Even while leaving these Hussein-era levies in place, Bremer
exempted his coalition authority, the armed forces, their contractors and
humanitarian organizations. Exempting occupation personnel leaves only the
Iraqis to pay taxes, as well as journalists, business people and other
foreigners.

Looking back at the failed attempt by presidential candidate Forbes to
rally U.S. public support behind the flat tax, Gene Sperling, a senior
Clinton economic adviser who is with the Council on Foreign Relations,
said wryly, "If Steve Forbes does a bus tour [of Iraq] to promote it, I
hope they have adequate security."

Reply via email to