Joanna
dmschanoes wrote:
Really? I don't think so. I think it has nothing at all to do with experience and/or capability, and everything to do with connections and representing specific class interests. Revolutions, and reactions, have little enough trouble creating "leaders" without official experience.
Where former communist leaders are in power, it is the result of their experience, not in managing an economy or running a country, but in administering the impulse to capitalist restoration.
dms
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Doss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't know about the Romanian situation in particular, but one reason
why former "Communist" leaders are in power thruought EE is that they are the only ones with experience in actually running a country.
