Doug Henwood wrote: > > Marvin Gandall wrote: > > >If that is your position, you would be saying, against all evidence and > >logic, that there was a bipartisan consensus for the invasion of Iraq, > >and all the past year's noise and talk of a split in the US ruling class > >over the war was just so much malarkey. > > You don't understand. Parties and personnel don't matter. Whatever > happens is because of the deep inner needs of capital. Until the > revolution, it's just going to keep on keeping on like this. And the > revolution will emerge from nowhere, without warning, like an > earthquake. >
I wish once in awhile you would offer an argument rather than engaging in juvenile humor. Carrol > Doug
