for what it's worth...

noticed that thomas voted with supreme court majority yesterday in
opposition to
federal law re. pornography & children, his very first dissent from
conservative bloc
on court was in case involving porno (whether feds had entrapped some
guy to
purchase some stuff through mail), thomas rarely asks questions during
court
hearings no matter case issues and has little written record, but these
votes
(and several) others suggest that claims of his proclivity for porn may
have
merit... michael hoover

Reply via email to