Kenneth Campbell writes: >> Don't be silly. You are supposedly a lawyer. >> >> The refusal to perform negated the contract. But not the contractual >> duties owed to those expected to aid in the performance. >> >> The pathetic spat between the actual performers (in your little >> hypothetical) does not negate what the crew was due. And it is hardly a >> narrowed surplus value concept. >> >> Unlike some on here, I like the law. And the law does not negate >> equitable results. That has nothing to do with politics. (Or doesn't >> have to.
You misunderstand my questions. I am not asking whether the crew should be paid. I am trying to understand the labor theory of value/surplus value/exploitation in context. David Shemano
