[Succinct last paragraph]

URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/07/09/opinion/O9LAMB.html

The New York Times
July 9, 2004

   OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

The Two Sides of Kabul

   By CHRISTINA LAMB

   K ABUL, Afghanistan

   Look, the swimming pool is in the shape of a martini glass," boasts
   Alex, as he shows several visitors around his soon-to-be-opened
   hotel-cum-blackjack lounge. Alex, an Afghan-American who used to be a
   mortgage broker in Las Vegas, is really named Omar Zamadi, but he
   thinks that is too complicated for foreigners and foreigners are his
   market.

   Mr. Zamadi, who returned to his homeland a year ago, says he has
   invested $200,000 in his hotel, the Peacock Lounge. A pink-and-gold
   colonnaded extravaganza, which he describes as "Roman style" but
   probably owes more to Caesars Palace, the Peacock Lounge sticks out on
   a street in which families sleep in bombed-out houses with no roofs or
   windows and dusty-faced children walk to a well to collect water.

   "Expats need a place where they can wear thongs, eat hot dogs and
   drink beers," Mr. Zamadi says. "You can make a lot of money here."

   On the other side of the city, two Britons have set up Afghanistan's
   first cocktail bar, serving margaritas and Tora Bora specials to
   Westerners at $10 a drink. Their bar, the Elbow Room, is packed every
   night. So is a restaurant called Lal Thai where Lalita Thongngamkam's
   green chicken curry is served up by slinky waitresses from Bangkok in
   slit-to-the-thigh silk skirts with pistols in their garters.

   These are just a few of the many establishments for Westerners that
   have sprung up in postliberation Kabul, capital of the land cited by
   Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld as a model and described by
   President Bush last month as the "first victory in the war on terror."
   Not only would the Taliban's leader, Mullah Muhammad Omar, have a fit,
   but many who supported the war to oust the Taliban regime need wonder
   if an invasion of bars and restaurants for Westerners is really what
   it was for.

   Although aid workers, contractors and security consultants have every
   right to enjoy themselves, there is mounting resentment among ordinary
   Afghans, who feel the West has been busier opening drinking holes than
   rebuilding their nation.

   For some time, Afghanistan has been two countries: Kabul, which is
   relatively peaceful, and the rest, so riven by warlords and resurgent
   Taliban that the United Nations has declared a third of the country
   off limits to its employees.

   But more recently, Kabul has become a city with two sides. With as
   many as a 1,000 nongovernmental organizations in residence, rents are
   higher here than in much of Manhattan. In Kabul's most affluent area,
   Wazir Akbar Khan, once favored by Osama bin Laden's Arabs and now a
   Western enclave, $5,000 a month gets only a small, uncared-for house.
   Most of the owners are rich Afghans living abroad, and, according to
   real estate agents, many are Taliban commanders living in Pakistan and
   using the rent to finance madrassas and militia training.

   An agent from the Marco Polo agency who drove me around last month
   told me his company leases 10 houses to the World Food Program at
   rents of $9,000 to $15,000 a month per house. The total comes to more
   than $1.5 million a year. "Most Afghans feel angry that this is our
   money, money meant for the Afghan people, which aid agencies are
   spending on beautiful houses, carpets and drinking," while schools and
   hospitals still need to be built, the agent said.

   There may not yet be a Starbucks or McDonalds in Kabul but other
   fruits of liberation include Afghanistan's first boutique hotel,
   opened by a British woman, and a commercial radio station sponsored by
   Number One (a brand, which has become the local term for condoms). You
   can even take a putt at the Kabul golf club, where the landmines have
   apparently been cleared.

   At the same time, the vast majority of Afghan women still wear burqas,
   seen by many in the West as a symbol of Taliban oppression. The girls'
   soccer team at Zarghoona High School has to practice secretly and the
   days of Millies, the mini-skirted female drivers of Kabul's electric
   buses, remain a distant memory.

   Instead of creating industry or regenerating agriculture under Western
   supervision, Afghanistan is producing record opium crops and is now
   responsible for a whopping 75 percent of the world supply.

   Last week, the West finally had a chance to match words and deeds at
   the NATO summit meeting in Istanbul, where Afghanistan was high on the
   agenda. This was supposed to be an opportunity for the alliance to
   trumpet the success of its first peacekeeping operation outside its
   historic area of operations. Unlike the Iraqis, the Afghans generally
   welcome foreign forces. Yet the shameful failure of member nations to
   provide troops and equipment means that NATO has conspicuously failed
   to meet the pledge it made last year to expand outside Kabul. The NATO
   secretary general, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, described himself as feeling
   "like a beggar."

   The alliance still has only 6,500 peacekeeping forces in Afghanistan,
   compared with 40,000 in Kosovo. Last week's announcement that it would
   send up to 3,500 more to provide security for the elections due to
   take place in September is laughable in a nation with an estimated
   10.5 million voters. Elections will now almost certainly be delayed.
   The need for a nationwide peacekeeping force if polls are to go ahead
   at all was highlighted two weeks ago when more than a dozen men were
   killed in Uruzgan Province after registering to vote and a minibus
   carrying female election workers was blown up in Jalalabad.

   The gap between the claims of Mr. Rumsfeld and others and the reality
   on the ground was vividly illustrated by a British patrol last month
   that stopped to talk to the malik, or village chief, of a mud-walled
   settlement on the edge of Kabul. After complaining about the shortage
   of wells, the malik assured the patrol's commander that "life is much
   better than it was under the Taliban." When asked how, the malik had
   to think hard. "We can watch videos," he said finally. Then he added:
   "at least we could if we had television. Or electricity." Keen to
   please his visitors, he thought again. "Our girls can go to school,"
   he said, then once more frowned. "Only there is no school."

   Christina Lamb is the author of "The Sewing Circles of Herat: A
   Personal Voyage Through Afghanistan."

Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company

Reply via email to