The below was written for a different purpose, after my recent extended
period of teaching in Shanghai.
It is not a profound economic analysis at all, rather it is a view of
the heatlh services. Even there I have omitted stats for lack of time to
research them, tho' this will follow.

Purpose was to convey the bitterness of indidivual decision making, that
is going on in China.
Hari
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Health Care In China Today, following privatization of the Health Care
System

Astonishingly, there remain some who call themselves Marxist-Leninists,
yet who still believe that the China of today is a socialist state. Even
if we can agree to leave aside our fundamental differences with them
regarding the political character of Mao Ze Dong, this belief of such
people is too “far beyond the pale” not to challenge. Alliance can
understand at least [without agreeing with], that school of Maoists who
say that after Mao, socialism in China disintegrated. We do not agree
with the implied lauding of Mao, but this latter formulation at least
does recognise that the China post-Mao is not a socialist state. But to
say it remains a socialist state now, is untenable.

One does not need to visit China to be aware of the amazing rifts in the
social fabric that have been allowed to further accentuate differences
between rich and poor. Since Deng Xiaoping proclaimed it was socialist
to “Enrich Yourself!” – the green light for all manner of rapacious
grabs was given.

We will examine one small area that acts as a litmus indicator of how
every-day life for ordinary people has dramatically changed. In the days
when the pretence of being ‘socialist’ was far more important than it is
now, there was at least a modicum of equality in the health care
services. The legacy of the legions of health care workers of Chinese
background was astounding. The legacy of foreign workers (those like Dr
Norman Bethune and Dr Joshua Horn) who came to China to assist the
Liberation forces and the Chinese medical corps, was honourable. What
has been done with this legacy?
It has been ravaged by “market forces”. A recent article by Geoffrey
York, lays out some disturbing facts.

“Public health services have eroded. Medical services have crumbled.
Doctors and hospitals generate profit by charging higher fees. And those
who cannot afford the fees are left out in the cold. Two-thirds of the
population has no health insurance. About 60 to 70 percent of hospital
patients are forced to end hospital treatment prematurely because they
are unable to pay.
A recent UN report found that China’s health system is suffering a
‘profound decline” because of the shift to a profit based system.
Because of the commercialization of medicine, health costs have jumped
400% in the past decade. And the medical system has become the top cause
of poverty: more than 40% of poor families have fallen into poverty
because of high medical costs. In some of the poorest regions, illness
and mortality rates are increasing despite the economic prosperity in
the rest of the country. Diseases such as TB and Hepatitis B are
reappearing, and immunizations are being neglected because they don’t
generate a profit. Drug prices are routinely inflated and unnecessary
treatments arte often prescribed so that the hospitals can earn income. “
“York G: “In New China, millions can’t afford doctors”; May 17th 2004;
Globe and Mail p. A10.

Under the previous era:
“Health cooperatives, and barefoot doctors ensured a minimum level of
medical care for everyone even in the poor rural areas. Life expectancy
rose dramatically and most children were immunized. “It was a public
health model for the world, and it achieved some incredible things”,
said Lisa Lee, a medical officer in Beijing for the WHO. But as China
switched from socialism to free-market capitalism, it decided to
privatize most of its health system. “The medical cooperatives have been
disbanded and nothing has replaced it” Dr Lee said. “Some very
vulnerable and poor segments of the population are being left behind.
Critical health services are falling through the gaps.“
Geoffrey York Ibid.

These problems are enormous and naturally affect the most vulnerable and
poorest sections the hardest:

“The problems are greatest in rural areas, where 90% of patients must
pay cash for health services. Chinese media have reported cases of women
dying in childbirth because they couldn’t afford a hospital delivery.
But the problem is also hurting people in big cites. Forty percent of
urban dwellers have no insurance, and even the insured are often forced
to pay most of their medical costs from their own pockets”.
York, G Ibid.

Health care workers are naturally disturbed and upset that they are
forced to participate in this sham of a heath care system:

“In a recent report to the Chinese parliament, one physician told
poignant stories of impoverished patients and their lack of care. “As
soon as the diagnosis is completed, the patients ask me how much the
treatment will cost”, Wang Chunlan wrote. “When I estimate the cost ,
many of them say nothing. They just turn around to leave the hospital.
And as I watch them leave I feel deeply sad.”
York G Ibid.

The individual case histories are poignant.

“Han Fengzhou sat on the edge of his bed, staring vacantly ahead unable
to see the see the grimy walls or cement floors or bare neon bulbs of
the two room apartment in Beijing where he has spent most of his life.
For the past 9 years he has been going blind. A simple cataract
operation, costing a few hundred dollars, would have saved his eyesight.
But on his meager pension he can’t afford it. …”In the past we never
worried about health care because the government took care of it for us”
said the 89-year-old retired labourer. “Today if we don’t have money we
dare not enter a hospital. We miss the old days of Mao, when we could
see a doctor whenever we felt uncomfortable”.
York G Ibid.

Costs of medicines are simply exorbitant, making for horrifying effects
on decision making by both patients and doctors. This is compounded by
the Malthusian policies of the state. So in the context of a one child
per family policy, many boys are given maximal therapy and many girls
are allowed to die. Thus there is now a life saving therapy for a
disease of prematurity known as hyaline membrane disease. Essentially,
the preterm lung is devoid of a chemical known as surfactant that
enables the lung to stay open and inflated. Surfactant is now able to be
instilled into the lung, with consequent life saving effect. There is
very good evidence for this now, and it is not a debatable therapy – its
imply saves lives and reduces intellectual handicap of survivors.
However, each vial of surfactant costs the equivalent of 300 yuan
currently [NB. At the time of writing, 1 Canadian dollar = 7 yuan. But
of course the dollar value is irrelevant to the purchasing power of the
average Chinese family]. A course of treatment requires some 3 vials.
Consequently, many babies are simply left without therapy. In some cases
the parents take the infant home to die, and is some cases the parents
simply abandon the infant to the Reaper in the hospital. I am unable to
say which course of inaction is worse for either the baby or for the family.

Preventive Strategies Uprooted by Foreign and Local Corporate Interests

Naturally in the intensified “Enrich Yourself” environment of China
today, many other social ills impact on the health of the people. The
story of the elimination of schistosomiasis by the Chinese people is
well known. In this famous campaign of the year ----, the vector that
carries the deadly parasite, a snail, was hunted down in the canals and
riverbanks that it leaves. This was a very labour intensive and
coordinated effort by the entire peoples. Effectively, it did eliminate
schistosomiasis. Yet, the disease is creeping back. But the socialist
health care principle of “ First prevention, then cure if necessary” –
has been superseded by “No prevention, cure if paid for”.

As Western countries under pressure from the working peoples have
adopted largely preventive health care strategies, such as tobacco
avoidance, and reduction of dangerous foods – the profits of giant
corporations such as Imperial Tobacco and McDonalds foods have been
eroded. They have started to recoup their cut revenues by preying on the
Chinese population. The fastest growing area for new franchise for
McDonald is China – which are opening outlets at the rate of 100 a month
since their entry into the Chinese marketplace in 2004. Already the
effects of obesity in children can be seen, as Western diets rapidly
catch a hold in young children.

Reply via email to