In a message dated 8/11/2004 12:06:10 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From the perspective of living labor, what is the difference between
state and non-state management if their common goal is the ruthless
expansion of value?
 
Comment
 
The property relations that determines the circuit of reproduction and give it a distinct shape.
 
Under the best socialism . . . or rather under the socialism that has and exist . . . one sells their labor power . . . even if it is to a system that is the dictatorship of the proletariat.
 
At best socialism is a transition in the form of property and does not equal the abolition of property. Socialism has never meant freedom to me.
 
You are correct concerning my use of 800 million. They are rural as opposed to agricultural sector.  
 
Nevertheless my base question was what did Fidel say that qualified as being horrified by China.
 
Melvin P.

Reply via email to