On the exchange between Robert Naiman and Patrick Bond -- In his
latest NYT column, Krugman compares the current situation to
1929-1930.  I guess there are parallels.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/21/opinion/21krugman.html

However, three strong reasons most economists would list to show why
things are not likely to go that far in, say, length and unemployment
rates, are:

(1) regular bank deposits (as opposed to money in unregulated funds)
are federally insured;

(2) one fifth of GDP is (potentially counter-cyclical) government
spending, compared to one-digit percentages in the 1920s; and

(3) today's monetary policy may lack traction, but it's not likely to
be as pro-cyclical as it was in the 1930s (as documented by Friedman &
Schwartz and, more recently, Meltzer).

I heard these and other arguments yesterday on Bloomberg radio or
NPR... can't remember, had/have a very bad cold.  With regards to (1),
one may argue that the balance sheets of banks are all intertwined
with those of the hedge funds, so regular banks -- even those who
steered clear of subprime junk -- are likely to get hit.  True, still,
the bulk of the regular deposits are insured.  Deposit insurance does
limit the damage.

And with regards to (2) and (3), it's hard to imagine the U.S. society
melting in the near future to such point as to evaporate the overall
creditworthiness of the state, which is ultimately based on the still
large amount of productive wealth (physical and human) the country
has.  What Bernanke is doing now is probably the best that can be done
within the framework he's inherited.  An Obama administration could
expand that framework significantly.  Not saying that it would.

Global capitalist leadership may well continue to fail.  I wish I
could say that such failure opens opportunities for an alternative,
but that's not necessarily so.  The alternative requires a lot of
basic educational and organizational work that is not there yet.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to