The New York Times/April 11, 2008

Op-Ed Contributor

The Fed's Money Well Spent
By ALICE M. RIVLIN

Washington

ONE benefit of the Federal Reserve's rescue of Bear Stearns is that
public outrage has aroused the political system to action in
mitigating the foreclosure crisis.

Never mind that the supposed conflict between Wall Street and Main
Street is a false one — Main Street runs on credit and cannot prosper
if the financial system is in shambles and credit dries up. Never mind
that the supposed Fat Cat "bailout" was a disaster for Bear Stearns
stockholders, and that the idea of a "moral hazard" risk — that other
investment banks will be tempted to emulate Bear Stearns — is
preposterous. Never mind that if markets head back up and the
collateral can be sold at a profit, taxpayers may lose nothing.

In the end, the Fed's action was not aimed at rescuing those who made
bad decisions out of greed or stupidity, but at protecting the rest of
the country — and indeed the world — from the possibly devastating
consequences of a financial meltdown.

Nevertheless, the outrage is both understandable and useful. Public
money has been put at risk to calm a storm on Wall Street while
ordinary people are losing their homes. The public is crying, "What
about us?" and politicians are listening, as they should.

Like the failure of a financial behemoth, spreading foreclosures
engulf the innocent as well as the imprudent and unwise. To be sure,
many homeowners were shortsighted and greedy. Like their Wall Street
counterparts they borrowed too much and got caught when the music
stopped. Like the Bear Stearns shareholders, they should take losses.
But putting them out of their homes does not merely harm them and
their children, it endangers whole neighborhoods and drags down the
assets of their more prudent neighbors.

Congress and the Bush administration should move quickly — as they
proved they could with the rapid passage of the stimulus package — to
enact laws to ease the renegotiation of mortgages and keep homeowners
who are able to pay the new charges in their homes. Public money will
have to be put at risk, but it is worth it. The deals should be
structured so that the taxpayer shares in the gains if markets recover
and the properties or mortgages are later sold at a profit.

When the immediate crisis is past, however, we must turn to the
difficult task of reducing the chances of a replay. It will not be
easy to design regulations that do more good than harm, but at the
very least all financial institutions that stand to benefit from
Federal Reserve help in a crisis must be subject to regulatory
scrutiny to make sure they are managing their risk prudently. There
must be higher capital requirements and limits on excessive leverage.
If the rules are reasonable, we should not weep if a few high fliers
choose to move their operations to other countries with laxer rules.
Our markets will be better off without them.

After that, we must take on the even harder job of sorting through the
explosion of financial instruments that have proliferated in the boom
and deciding which belong in our kit of tools and which should be
relegated to the waste heap. If they genuinely spread risk and help
move capital into more productive uses, they should stay. But some
exotic derivatives seem mainly to reflect the efforts of traders to
outsmart each other. Their opaqueness may entail more systemic risk
than social value.

The folks who devise these exotica are talented enough to create
something useful. We would all be better off if they were productively
employed in the "real" economy — or pursued wealth in Las Vegas, where
the risks the smartest gamblers pose to the house are carefully
controlled.

Alice M. Rivlin, a former vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board
and director of the Office of Management and Budget in the Clinton
administration, is a senior fellow in economic studies at the
Brookings Institution.

Copyright 2008 The New York Times Company
 --
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to