>She described the ideology as viewing supply's influence on demand as akin to the moon's pull on the tide. This is about >as wrong as can be. If supply and demand are not independent the entire neoclassical model collapses. From where did >she pull this analogy?
She must have supply-side macroeconomics in mind, not technical micro-economics? If so, her description is not that out of line. The economy doesn't work that way, but that is more or less how the supply-side doctrine treats it. Mat
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
