Anybody read Sam Bowles "Microeconomics"?

I'm fighting my way through it now.

The math (so far) is not hard, it's just tedious.
Seems like he could establish the points, which

I think are important, much more clearly, with

 less jargon and fewer words.  I can't imagine

using this as a textbook, except as an exercise

in sadism.



> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jim Devine
> Sent: 04:02 pm
> To: Progressive Economics
> Subject: Re: [Pen-l] textbook bias
> 
> Sandwichman wrote:
> > Thanks to Google Books, I'm now sifting through a century of economics
> > textbooks to document the rise, mutation and consolidation of the
> > lump-of-labor fallacy, which is falsely attributed as a "cherished
> > belief" of trade unions and workers. I have nearly 300 citations. Very
> > rarely does anyone point out the lack of evidence for the claim.
> 
> standard economics textbooks don't refer to evidence of any sort
> unless it fits their preestablished perspective.
> 
> > Having now published two articles analyzing the contradictions and
> > unscientific basis of the claim, I patiently await the awakened
> > consensus of those in the economics field that perhaps there has
> > indeed been some bias in the past by economists with regard to the
> > issue of reduced working time.
> 
> don't hold your breath.
> 
> > Betting against a century of textbook lore, I've even offered a
> > $10,000 prize to anyone who can conclusively refute my debunking of
> > the fallacy claim. Now if only I could enlist the support of ten or
> > fifteen economics professors for a campaign to set the record straight
> > on the economics of working time.
> 
> when are textbooks going to actually describe the political-economic
> ideas of Marx without gross distortion? (I picked up a _sociology_
> book that was equally bad.)
> -- 
> Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
> way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
> 

_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to