from SLATE's news summary (Thursday, 6/11/08): >In an op-ed piece in
the NY[TIMES], [former SecState] Madeleine Albright writes that the
failure of the international community to pressure the Burmese
government after Cyclone Nargis not only illustrates how totalitarian
regimes are "alive and well" but that they're also unlikely to face
pressure from neighbors to change their ways. There used to be a
generally accepted belief that while sovereignty is important, there
were certain moments when other countries could intervene to save
lives. But after the invasion of Iraq, "[g]overnments, especially in
the developing world, are now determined to preserve the principle of
sovereignty," writes Albright. "Even when the human costs of doing so
are high."<

I think that more countries would be willing to soften their
sovereignty rights a smidgen if the US were willing to soften its.
After all, its unilateral invasion of Iraq should have justified an
invasion by Canada and Mexico -- in the name of human rights, of
course.
-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to