me: >> The essence of the argument that Gary Dymski and I launch against John >> Roemer's theory of exploitation under capitalism is that he sees >> "surplus-value" (a.k.a. property income) as merely scarcity rent. I'm >> not going to repeat that argument here. Our papers appear in >> _Economics and Philosophy_, 7(2), October 1991: pp. 235-275 and >> _Review of Radical Political Economics_, 21(3), 1989: pp. 13-17.
John V. wrote: > Sorry, cannot comment; I live too far away from a univ. library to read them > and they're not available to me online. The former (E&P) article is now available at http://myweb.lmu.edu/jdevine/JD-1991-Roemer.pdf It was available all along, but somehow I never noted it in my web-site listing my on-line articles. -- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante. _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
