Yeah, I do disagree with that assessment, you won't be surprised to know.

Dennis Kucinich is a "Democrat."

Either the political differences between Kucinich and Clinton matter,
or else that critique is not enough.

On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Carrol Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Robert Naiman wrote:
>>
>>
>> But just as progressive folks shouldn't be Obamamaniacs, neither
>> should they be the crude negation of that.
>
> Then you disagree with the assessment of Obama contained in the
> proposition, "He's a Democrat, for God's sake"?
>
> I myself have never found it necessary to go further than this with any
> DP politician since Wayne Morse was defeated for reelection.
>
> This of course is dogmatism, but it is also a dogma which has been
> confrimed empirically month after month, year after year, for half a
> century.
>
> Carrol
>
> _______________________________________________
> pen-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
>
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to