http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-losingfaith16-2008jul16,0,1516735.story
NEWS ANALYSIS
Americans may be losing faith in free markets
Things are hard all over the financial landscape, and politicians and
experts are now looking with favor at more, not less, government
involvement in the economy.
By Peter G. Gosselin
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
July 16, 2008
WASHINGTON — For a generation, most people accepted the idea that the
core of what makes America tick was an economy governed by free markets.
And whatever combination of goods, services and jobs the market cooked
up was presumed to be fine for the nation and for its citizens --
certainly better than government meddling.
No longer.
Spurred by the continued housing crisis, turmoil in financial markets,
spiking oil prices, disappearing jobs and shrinking retirement savings,
the nation and its political leaders have begun to sour on the notion
that the current market system is the key to a fair, stable and
efficient society.
"We're at a hinge point," said William A. Galston, a senior fellow at
the Brookings Institution in Washington who helped craft President
Clinton's market-friendly agenda during the 1990s. "The strong
presumption in favor of markets, which has dominated public policy since
the late 1970s, has been thrown very much into question."
Now, to a degree not seen in years, politicians and outside experts are
looking with favor at more, not less, government involvement in the economy.
Of course, Americans always grouse during troubled times. And as market
advocates are quick to point out, the current run of bad economic breaks
has yet to result in the throwing over of free-market principles in
favor of some drastically different approach -- such as a
government-directed economy.
"There may be a backlash against markets at the moment," acknowledged
Kevin A. Hassett, economic studies director at the American Enterprise
Institute in Washington and an advisor to presumed Republican
presidential nominee John McCain. "But the backlash doesn't seem to be
informed by any alternative view of how the world works."
Yet the sheer volume of setbacks that people have been dealt has sent
consumer confidence to some of its lowest levels in half a century,
according to Reuters/University of Michigan surveys. A remarkable 84% of
Americans are convinced that the nation is on the "wrong track,"
according to a recent Gallup poll.
In just the last week, the financial markets have provided ample new
evidence that markets are not working smoothly.
Washington had to ride to the rescue of two government-chartered
mortgage giants -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which hold or guarantee
nearly half of the nation's $12 trillion in mortgage debt -- after
investors all but extinguished the pair's market value amid fears that
falling home prices would push them into insolvency.
Meanwhile, federal regulators seized IndyMac Bancorp, a $32-billion
mortgage lender based in Pasadena, in what regulators called the
second-largest bank failure in U.S. history. And the already battered
stock market took another sharp dip.
The fact that experts keep pushing back the date when conditions may
improve and the failure thus far of any national leader -- including
either of the major-party presidential candidates -- to offer a
convincing vision of how America will make its way back to sustained
prosperity suggest that the current crisis will probably be very
different from other recent economic bad patches.
So may Americans' reaction to it.
Even the Bush administration, which took office arguing that the Social
Security crisis could be solved, in part, by tying some of retirees'
future benefits to Wall Street, has begun advocating more government
regulation of financial markets. When Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which
are government-chartered but investor-owned, began to teeter last week,
the administration quietly went to work on possible government action.
"If the pendulum swung away from government toward much greater
confidence in markets during the last generation, the pendulum is
clearly swinging back again now," said Daniel Yergin, whose 1998 book
with coauthor Joseph Stanislaw, "The Commanding Heights," chronicled the
worldwide spread of the free-market credo.
"Everything is weighing in at the same time, and that affects how people
view markets and government," Yergin said.
"Nobody in this country really believes in unfettered free markets, and
nobody really believes in socialism," said UC Davis historian Eric
Rauchway, but economic crises of the past have produced constituencies
favoring the reining in of markets and regulation of the economy --
constituencies that ultimately grew large enough to produce change.
Consider just a few of the things that are pushing people in that
direction now:
The price for a gallon of regular unleaded gasoline has nearly doubled
in the last year, while that for a barrel of crude oil has more than
doubled, cutting short Americans' love affair with gas-guzzlers and
driving the nation's trucking, auto and airline industries into deep
trouble.
Most mainstream economists assert that these increases are simply the
logical outcome of booming global demand meeting limited global supply.
But the price run-ups seem out of whack with demand, which has increased
only about 1% worldwide. The mismatch has fueled suspicion among many
Americans and their political leaders that the third financial bubble of
the decade -- after tech stocks and housing -- is underway, this time in
energy.
Both presidential candidates have fingered market speculators, rather
than the forces of supply and demand, for helping drive up prices.
At a recent hearing, Rep. John D. Dingell (D-Mich.) cornered the federal
official whose agency regulates the market where oil futures are traded.
"How is it that the market isn't working to the benefit of the consuming
public?" the lawmaker demanded.
The agency has launched a number of studies to discover whether
speculators are behind the price increases, the official answered.
"Don't tell me you're doing studies!" Dingell shot back. "You've spent
more than a year sitting idly by" while oil prices jumped.
At least half a dozen measures have been introduced in Congress to limit
speculation or to tax oil company profits.
Similar anger -- and similar legislative efforts to intervene in the
marketplace -- can be seen in housing.
While Americans have been accustomed to some fluctuation in the value of
their homes, most expected their houses to rise in value over time. And
for much of the last several decades, that's what happened.
But starting in mid-2004, the upward arc of house prices began to
flatten, and by 2007 it was falling -- sharply. Prices, especially along
the West and East coasts, have skidded as much as 16% during the last
year alone, their steepest decline in two decades. Many analysts predict
further slippage.
In large part, the rise in house prices and the recent plunge grew out
of an almost unregulated corner of the mortgage market -- the one for
riskier loans.
As with fuel, "the message that Americans are getting is that something
went wrong with the markets and you got hurt," said economist Robert E.
Litan of the Brookings Institution and the Kauffman Foundation of Kansas
City, Mo.
"With energy, it's the speculators. With housing, it's predatory lenders
or crummy credit-rating agencies or stupid banks. We're not ready to
throw out markets altogether," he said, "but we want government to do
something about the excess."
A similar pattern of hopes raised and hopes dashed shows up in global
trade and retirement investing.
Americans entered the new century convinced that "we had a new economy
built on services and information technology that would let us win
globally," said Harvard economist Robert Z. Lawrence.
"The whole premise of globalization in the year 2000 was that it worked
well for us and the other developed countries but that the developing
countries would need help," Lawrence said.
Today, virtually all those optimistic assumptions have been turned on
their heads.
"We've seen unprecedented growth in the developing countries, while the
developed countries are being led into a slowdown by the United States,"
Lawrence said.
"We've found out that instead of services and information technology,
it's all about oil and other commodities" that are not the nation's
strong suit.
Finally, when it comes to investment, especially for retirement, recent
years have brought unsettling disappointments as the stock market has
failed to regain and maintain the peaks that it reached in 2000.
An investor who put a dollar in a broad market index fund early in this
decade not only would have made no money by today but would have lost a
little of his initial amount.
That's a far cry from the 1990s, when people told pollsters that they
expected to make 15% annual gains indefinitely.
Historians watching the nation's current economic and financial troubles
say that just because Americans don't throw up their hands about markets
and rush to an opposite pole, such as socialism, it doesn't mean that
change isn't underway.
As UC Davis' Rauchway pointed out, the devastating panics and
depressions of the late 19th century eventually resulted in the
progressive reforms of the early 20th century and, later, the New Deal
of the 1930s.
Today, Americans are not ready to throw out markets altogether, said
economist Litan, but "what people may be demanding is New Deal lite."
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
