[Thanks to "Wait, Wait... Don't Tell Me," one of US NPR''s best news shows.]

Music as torture may incur royalty fees

· Canadian lawyer suggests songwriters may be owed money

· David Gray admits using Babylon 'is torture'

Sean Michaels
Wednesday July 9, 2008
guardian.co.uk

International copyright law is a morass; a mighty difficult thing to
navigate. We like to imagine it as a vast military base, crisscrossed
with checkpoints and barbed-wire, where only the accredited experts
can get in and out. Like the American prison at Guantánamo Bay.

So it's appropriate that real-life Guantánamo may be tangled up with
the metaphorical international-copyright Guantánamo. If US
interrogators have been using pop songs as torture, as has been
reported, then they may owe the songwriters performance royalties.

Howard Knopf, a Canadian lawyer specialising in intellectual property,
was first to raise the question. He was responding to continued
reports that loud music is being used by America in the interrogation
of terrorist suspects. The same songs are repeatedly played to
detainees at high volume - until they capitulate.

Babylon, the mild-mannered folk hit by David Gray, is allegedly one of
the most popular torture songs at Guantánamo. Speaking to the BBC last
week, Gray was incredulous. "That is torture," he said. "It doesn't
matter what the music is - it could be Tchaikovsky's finest or it
could be Barney the Dinosaur. It really doesn't matter, it's going to
drive you completely nuts."

Gray's fury aside, Knopf wondered on his influential copyright blog
whether the singer-songwriter might be owed royalties by the US
military. Performance rights associations demand that licenses be
purchased if music is to be played in a public space.

"Certain collectives are quick to collect money from those in nursing
homes, hospitals, prisons etc, on the basis that these are 'public'
places," Knopf wrote. "Never mind that the audience is captive and
it's their home, like it or not."

Though in Europe artists enjoy the "moral right" to veto the use of
their songs in contexts they do not approve of, it's unclear whether
Gray, an Englishman, would be able to bar the use of his song at the
Guantánamo base, an American territory.

There's also the issue of enforcing copyright law. If ASCAP, BMI or
SESAC decided to chase an uncooperative US military on the subject of
torture-music royalties, how they would twist the Pentagon's arm?
Maybe they could circle the building in a helicopter, blasting out a
James Blunt tune? Just an idea.
-- 
Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own
way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
_______________________________________________
pen-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l

Reply via email to